Risk off

As I have been writing about for some time, the market has been rolling over. If you have time for only one chart, pay attention to the S&P500 falling below its 21 day moving average of prices a few days ago and today breaching its 50 day moving average (and while the most unfortunate inclusion of TSLA in the S&P500 could be part of it, a review of the charts shows the move involves more than just TSLA). Add a dramatic rise in the VXX. What is remarkable about the new downtrend is the fact that equities can go down despite a historic explosion in M2 money supply.

rising volatility is consistent with risk off

GME attracted most of the market’s attention, together with disruption in the universe of marginal names which all saw an explosion of volume and price (although bubble names like DASH could not hold on for more than a few moments). But the YOLO traders face an uncomfortable fact: their trade structure is doomed to fail unless they are able to attract an ever increasing volume of money. In other words, like any ponzi scheme, it can only go up with ever increasing flow. Once the flow stalls or falls price collapses. Given the time decay inherent in options these YOLO traders utterly depend on ever growing price (and thus flows) just to stay flat. But this week’s volume only saw GME hit the highest traded volume of all stocks mid week. Volume quickly tapered off and on Friday looked very ordinary. Consequently the GME chart is actually only gap up, trend down, gap up, trend down, not a good look at all (and certainly not something that would attract longs). While structural negatives also impact the trade (such as the increased capital requirements imposed on brokers by this volatility which in turn results in restrictions on user access and leverage) they are beside the point in this chart review as they would be incorporated in the price action. You do know, however, when YOLO traders start talking about conspiracy theories in reaction to their brokerage limits that this trading strategy does not depend on the acquisition of market knowledge.

strong volume only midweek is not good; gap up, trend down, gap up, trend down is not good; MACD topping out is not good

As a side note I am astounded that not a single market operator mentioned that r/Wallstreetbets is in fact just a repeat of the pool operators of the 1800s and the 1920s (the media was focused on how new this all was). Of course in those days the pool operators would tend to be wealthy insiders and CEOs. I believe the CEO of GM at the time directed quite a successful pool but there were many such groups until they were banned. Did no one who writes about finance actually read Reminiscences of a Stock Operator? During that time the pools were a major force in the stock market and often moved stock prices.

There is some suggestion that the troubles hedge funds ran into when dead businesses suddenly rose 100% or more in a day caused them to liquidate what they could and thus tank the entire market is an interesting idea. I doubt it helped but I rather think the signs of divergence and weakness were present (and written about here) before the GME blow up. But that is beside the point. The charts are showing a clear trend now. The presence of these late stage bubble events serve as yet more warning that the trend change should be taken seriously.

Leave a comment