The two price box problem

Last week posed a massive problem for momentum traders as the 10 year rates started to really get going. Despite Monday’s bump, what the market confronted last Friday was the first drop into a prior price box. QQQ had formed a $340/$320 price box in January to February but fell below that price box last week in a week that was bouncing up and down along that price box as the market struggled to hold it. If you are not a YOLO trader, the rule would be to add to your exposure when a new and higher price box formed and, most important, cut your exposure when price fell back to a prior lower price box (which happened last week). Monday would have been a head fake because anyone anticipating buying at the bottom of the price box would have been sorely disappointed as price fell below the price box on Tuesday and subsequent days (in the QQQ).

The remainder of the week was no better as each drop confirmed the new lower price box was now the current price box and the $340/$320 price box was history.

In mid-morning trade, at the lowest point, QQQ breached the second price box and briefly fell below $300, entering the $300/$200 price box. It closed up as the entire market rallied off the mid-morning low but this breach of the second price box is not encouraging, to say the least.

If rates resume their climb next week, or in a few weeks (as 2% is expected on the 10 year by year end), QQQ could easily fall into the $300/$200 price box. In other words, QQQ below $300 could threaten $200 in short order.

This week’s charts provide a startling number of price box breaches or near breaches, a negative tone to say the least for risk assets. A bull market should only see higher price boxes. A drop into a lower price box should be a clear signal to reduce long exposure. So, when Monday was the best day in months that is paradoxically not a good sign for risk assets as some of the biggest up days occur in bear markets.

The poster child for the current bubble is, of course, ARKK and its TSLA fuelled run up. The fact that ARKK is negative for the year, breached three price boxes and closed, despite the day’s bounce off the morning lows by the market, in the third price box does not bode well. Predictions are always hazardous but not only is the price action discouraging, along with the ultra high short interest, but the LTCM/Neil Woodford school of risk management for this current largest inflow fund manager ($50B under management) underscores the risk in this market. Not only is there potential for redemptions to overwhelm liquidity, and with so many oversized exposures to illiquid and tiny issues where ARKK is the whale, but the SEC short swing rule 16 mentioned by the FT.com seems to be in play which would aggravate “frictions” in any attempt to generate liquidity. The only thing missing is r/Wallstreetbets touting ARKK.

$160/$140 and $140/$120 price boxes breached; now in $120/$100 price box; nearly touched lower parallel intraday.

With the $160/$140 and $140/$120 price boxes breached ARKK is currently precariously sitting at $117 in the $120/$100 price box. Given recent moves the $100/$80 price box is not far off (indeed today’s lows went more than halfway toward the next price box).

TSLA is not helping in this regard as its $900/$600 price box was breached, opening up the $600/350 price box. After $350 the next price box would be $350/$200. Fortunately the SPY does not care despite TSLA’s inclusion (brilliant move S&P 500 committee) which means that the Fed does not care (but if ARKK does a LTCM does this imply that it is, finally, not systematic for once?).

For this week at least all I see are price boxes:

1 thought on “The two price box problem”

Leave a comment